🔗 Share this article

The move from the Democratic National Committee to suppress the release regarding its own autopsy report concerning the last presidential race appears shocking yet not surprising. Resistant to unpleasant candor, the DNC often functions more like a communications shop than a political organization focused on cultivating a volunteer base capable of prevailing at the polls.

A Climate Resistant to Internal Critique

Unwilling to challenge the prevailing attitude demanding unity, the committee has continued within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Releasing such a report would have indicated that party leaders are interested to promote public discourse regarding the strategic failures which allowed the former president to become president again. Yet, the DNC is proceeding under the pretense that there's nothing to understand from the electoral catastrophe of 2024.

"Here’s our North Star: is this good for winning elections? If not, it is an unnecessary diversion from what truly matters," a rationale that has been offered to justify concealing the document.

Key Issues an Analysis Could Have Examined

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would tackle head-on key points of failure. These include:

• Electoral Disenchantment: The loss among millions of voters who voted for the Democratic ticket in 2020 was decisive in the narrowly decided recent race.
• The Insistence to Seek Re-election: The determined insistence by the incumbent to run again, alongside a very late withdrawal, is viewed as robbing the party's base of a genuine choice.
• Failing Everyday Americans: While facing economic anxiety, the electoral effort allegedly accommodating powerful financial backers without successfully attempting to confront the role of big business.
• The Gaza Effect: An unwillingness to adjust a policy position regarding a major international conflict allegedly caused losing key demographic groups, particularly with youth voters, Arab-Americans, and Muslim Americans.
• Losing Youth Support: Research indicates a huge decrease of Democratic support from the youth electorate.

A History of Evasion

The decision to withhold fits a longstanding habit of evading hard truths. It echoes a situation in which virtually every elected Democrat in Washington went along with a sitting president's decision for running for re-election right up until a poor campaign event compelled an exit.

Meanwhile, overwhelming numbers of the electorate were continually telling researchers of their opposition to the incumbent to seek re-election.

Financial Concerns

A substantive report could probe matters about campaign spending, such as what sums were directed to high-priced advisors and advertising contractors during an electoral effort that burned through a staggering war chest over a few months.

The Larger Implication

Fundamentally, the secrecy of the official autopsy points to an allegiance toward party leaders that oversaw an unsuccessful national race. The message for ordinary supporters – which includes countless loyal volunteers – appears to be that they do not have a right to understand the lessons the insiders claim to have learned from a report drawing from conversations with insiders.

An organization unable to publicly examine its mistakes finds it difficult to escape the pattern which was so helpful to their opponents.